Mandatory Inclusionary Housing

New study backs City Hall in zoning dispute with advocacy group Report claims stricter affordability quotas would hurt development

Rendering of One Flushing (Credit: Bernheimer Architecture via Crain s)

A City Hall-commissioned study claims that more stringent affordability and local-l上海同城对对碰交友社区

上海夜网论坛
abor requirements in rezoned districts proposed by a coalition of advocacy groups would backfire.

The coalition in question, Real Affordability for All, argues that the City’s Mandatory
Inclusion rules should require developers that benefit from rezonings to set aside a higher portion of units as affordable than currently mandated and also re上海千花社区

上海千花网交友
quire the hiring of local construction workers.

Although City Hall opposed RAFA s proposals, it offered the group a concession in the form of a study on their feasibility. That study, written by law firm Carter Ledyard Milburn and consulting firm BAE Urban Economics, is now out. It claims that a requirement to hire local workers or those who have completed state-mandated appre上海贵族宝贝

上海千花网龙凤论坛
nticeship programs would make the city vulnerable to lawsuits.

Adopting such a program in the zoning ordinance would likely violate federal and state laws and exceed the city s zoning authority, the report states.

The report also questioned RAFA’s recommendation that 50 percent of units at new developments be set aside for households making 上海千花社区

上海千花网交友
between 30 and 100 percent of area median income (the city currently mandates 30 percent of units), arguing that the change would make development financially unfeasible in many areas.

In a 上海同城对对碰交友社区

上海夜网论坛
statement, RAFA called the study “deeply flawed” and claimed it skewed numbers in favor of the city’s position. [Politico] Konrad Putzier 


We are having some technical difficulties. Try again later.

By clicking Subscribe you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *